Growing Profile · Historical descriptive selection label; origin and clone continuity unverified

Hoya lacunosa — speckled leaf

Separate a documented silver-mottled selection account from broad modern silver and splash descriptions.

Current evidence boundary

Separate a documented silver-mottled selection account from broad modern silver and splash descriptions.

Overview

Randal’s 2007 Stemma account documents cultivated material called speckled leaf. The historical description gives the label a source, while leaving its relationship to later silver-marked selections unresolved. This profile keeps that distinction visible.

Photo Gallery

No identity-, rights-, and profile-reviewed photographs are available yet.

Add a Photo

What We Know

  • Appearance and origin hypothesis: Randal describes strongly silver-mottled leaves and suggests a pallidiflora-sport origin. The suggestion is attributed to the author; it is not a demonstrated pedigree or a current taxonomic conclusion.
  • Behavior reported by the author: The account mentions green reversion and difficulty rooting cuttings, while expressly allowing that results could differ as more growers established plants. This horticultural testimony does not justify a universal propagation instruction.
  • Label continuity: Similar silver markings do not establish equivalence with every later Splash, Silver or Mint label. Original acquisition and propagation records would be needed to connect that material.

What We Are Still Learning

Which modern plants descend from the material described in 2007?

What would help: Dated acquisition records, original labels and a documented chain of propagated cuttings.

Contribute evidence for this question

How consistently does the reported reversion occur?

What would help: Identified material followed through several propagation cycles under recorded conditions.

Contribute evidence for this question

Can the reported rooting difficulty be tested with an appropriate comparison?

What would help: A controlled cultivation study reporting material identity, method, conditions and replicated outcomes.

Contribute evidence for this question

Common Misconceptions

  • Speckling is not proof that similarly marked plants belong to the same named selection.
  • An early rooting report does not establish that every plant with the label needs different care.

Research and Sources

Help answer this profile’s questions

Can you help connect this label to documented material? Original labels, acquisition records and dated photographs of leaves and flowers would help resolve the questions above.

Contribute evidence for this profile

See other Hoya lacunosa forms