Simonsson Juhonewe and Rodda (2017) — Hoya of Papuasia, Part I
A documented source used to build and check Hoya Library records. This page explains what the source is, what it contributes, and where its limits remain.
Peer-reviewed taxonomic revision24 May 2017
This source record is live while its research review continues. Bibliographic details and interpretations may change as the evidence is checked.
Citation
N. Simonsson Juhonewe; M. Rodda. Contribution to a revision of Hoya (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadoideae) of Papuasia. Part I: ten new species, one new subspecies and one new combination. 24 May 2017. pp. 97–147.
Contribution to a revision of Hoya of Papuasia, Part I is a 2017 taxonomic study by Nadhanielle Simonsson Juhonewe and Michele Rodda. It appeared in Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 69(1): 97–147.
From collections to descriptions
The paper brings together herbarium research, field observations and plants grown until they flowered. It publishes ten new species, one new subspecies and a new combination, and selects a lectotype for Hoya urniflora.
This is one contribution toward a regional revision. Its names, descriptions and conservation assessments document the authors’ work in 2017; later research may change their interpretation.
Finding the evidence
Pages 97–100 introduce the regional context and research methods.
Pages 100–145 contain the taxonomic treatments and illustrations.
Pages 145–147 provide the acknowledgements and references.
For a particular name or collection, retain the exact treatment, collector number and figure caption. A photograph of a cultivated research plant and a cited herbarium specimen have different evidentiary roles.
Read the paper
Read the publisher’s complete PDF. The article runs from page 97 to page 147; the retained PDF also includes a final blank page numbered 148.
Source notes and contributions
Have a clearer scan, a missing page, additional source details or a correction? Share it with the Library for review. You can choose information, photos, corrections or rights questions in the contribution form.
Read the text and figures at the publisher. Figure credits vary by panel. Permission acknowledged for use in this article does not establish permission for Library display. Privately indexed figure pages remain withheld; no source images or full text reproduced here.
