Rahayu, Fakhrurrozi & Putra (2018) — Hoya of Belitung Island

Research source

Rahayu, Fakhrurrozi & Putra (2018) — Hoya of Belitung Island

A documented source used to build and check Hoya Library records. This page explains what the source is, what it contributes, and where its limits remain.

2018 English
This source record is live while its research review continues. Bibliographic details and interpretations may change as the evidence is checked.

Citation

Sri Rahayu, Yulian Fakhrurrozi and Hirmas Fuady Putra. Hoya species of Belitung Island, Indonesia, utilization and conservation. 2018. Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 369–376.

Rights and access

This record cites and summarizes the source. Reuse of its original text, images, or scans depends on the rights and terms for those materials; this page does not grant permission to reproduce them.

How the Library handles rights and attribution

Sri Rahayu, Yulian Fakhrurrozi and Hirmas Fuady Putra, “Hoya species of Belitung Island, Indonesia, utilization and conservation,” Biodiversitas 19(2):369–376 (2018). Publisher record · Original PDF.

What was studied

The authors purposively explored 16 locations in May 2015, June 2016 and November 2017: seven heath forest, five beach, two mixed forest and two fruit-tree agroforest locations. They reported five species across Belitung Island and nearby small islands. These records document occupied survey sites; they do not estimate complete island-wide abundance.

Habitat records

Reading limits

Methods and Table 1 describe seven heath locations; the narrative says six and names Limau Manis, which is absent from Table 1 and the map. Table 1 calls the Seliu Island 2 H. verticillata population medium, whereas the narrative calls it large. The abstract and detailed habitat section attribute the climate summaries differently. The detailed attribution is used on the habitat pages, with the conflict retained. Ant presence does not establish mutualism, and the source’s “saprophyte” wording does not demonstrate saprotrophic nutrition. Habitat “preference” statements are author interpretations from purposive exploration, not tested selection or cultivation requirements.