Hidayat, Rahayu & Ningtyas (2012) — Selabintana Hoya habitat

Research source

Hidayat, Rahayu & Ningtyas (2012) — Selabintana Hoya habitat

A documented source used to build and check Hoya Library records. This page explains what the source is, what it contributes, and where its limits remain.

2012 Indonesian main text; Indonesian and English titles and abstracts
This source record is live while its research review continues. Bibliographic details and interpretations may change as the evidence is checked.

Citation

Syamsul Hidayat, Sri Rahayu and Kartika Ningtyas. Analisa Vegetasi Tempat Tumbuh Hoya purpureofusca Hook.f. di Resort Selabintana, Taman Nasional Gunung Gede-Pangrango. 2012. Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 103–110.

Rights and access

This record cites and summarizes the source. Reuse of its original text, images, or scans depends on the rights and terms for those materials; this page does not grant permission to reproduce them.

How the Library handles rights and attribution

Syamsul Hidayat, Sri Rahayu and Kartika Ningtyas, “Analisa Vegetasi Tempat Tumbuh Hoya purpureofusca Hook.f. di Resort Selabintana, Taman Nasional Gunung Gede-Pangrango,” Berita Biologi 11(1):103–110 (2012). Journal record · Public issue scan, article on printed pp. 103–110.

What was studied

The authors compared nine 10 × 10 m plots centered on trees occupied by Hoya purpureofusca with nine comparison plots in Selabintana Resort. Table 3 names six sampled occupied trees and gives their trunk diameters. The study also reports vegetation and environmental readings near the occupied trees.

Limits in the article

Its reported September 2011 fieldwork follows the printed 20 April 2011 manuscript receipt date; no explanation is supplied. Table 4 gives climber similarity as 0.435 (43.5%), while the conclusion says similarity in every stratum is at most 25%. Both printed statements are retained. The reported nearby air, light and soil readings do not establish species-wide requirements or growing targets.

The full article was reviewed in a public PDF viewer, but original PDF bytes could not be archived: the publisher download redirects to login and the public mirror refuses direct download. The indexed habitat findings remain labeled as web-source evidence.

Can you help us access this source?

Known — repository or access help needed

The full article was reviewed in a public PDF viewer, but original PDF bytes could not be archived: the publisher download redirects to login and the public mirror refuses direct download.

What would help: A lawful downloadable original PDF, a stable repository link that permits access, or repository assistance obtaining the original PDF bytes.

Contribute this source

Submissions enter private review. Rights, provenance, identity, and evidence checks still apply.

Evidence scope and limits

Web-source evidence reviewed; original PDF bytes not archived